Elephants Vocalize Like Us, Not Cats

The larynx of a dead elephant showed researchers that the pachyderms vocalize the way humans do, as opposed to the active larynx control employed by cats. Sophie Bushwick reports

Illustration of a Bohr atom model spinning around the words Science Quickly with various science and medicine related icons around the text

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Elephants don’t need cell phones to hold long distance conversations, their deep calls can travel miles. And although humans can’t always hear these vocalizations because of their low frequency, elephants produce them using the same mechanism that lets humans speak and sing. That finding is in the journal Science. [Christian T. Herbst et al., How Low Can You Go? Physical Production Mechanism of Elephant Infrasonic Vocalizations]

Until now, scientists did not know whether the elephant made sound the way we speak or differently, such as the way cats purr. A human produces noises because the vocal cords vibrate automatically when air flows past. But a cat must actively squeeze the muscles of its larynx to produce its deep, rhythmic purr.

When a zoo elephant died of natural causes, researchers took the animal’s larynx to their lab and ran air through it to find out which method elephants use to make sound. They could reproduce the large mammal’s low-frequency rumble, which means that an elephant doesn’t need to actively control its larynx like a cat does. For those who contend that this is irrelevant, [Chico Marx:] “There’s a whole lot of irrelephants in the circus.”


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


—Sophie Bushwick

[The above text is a transcript of this podcast.]

 

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe