January 12, 2015

Facebook Puts Its Money Where Your Mouth Is

The social media behemoth buys voice-recognition start-up Wit.ai to prepare for the impending Internet of Things. Larry Greenemeier reports

By Larry Greenemeier

SUBSCRIBE TO 60-Second Tech

Apple | Spotify | RSS

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.

Chatter about the Internet of Things is filling the air at the International Consumer Electronics Show (CES) in Las Vegas. And the long-sought holy grail of ubiquitous voice recognition really will eventually happen. Soon people will, as a matter of course, communicate with their cars, homes, appliances and gadgets by speaking instead of typing. And Facebook has seen—or maybe heard—the writing on the wall.

So the social media giant bought an 18-month-old start-up company called Wit.ai. Wit developed a plug-in code that lets software developers easily build speech-recognition into their products. Of course apps already exist that let you post to your Facebook feed without having to take your eyes off the road or sidewalk. But on the horizon are voice commands to search your Facebook feed or even voice recognition to log on to your account.

Wit says its software will remain open source. But for Facebook to have the company in house gives it access to the tools needed to keep up with tech powerhouses such as Apple and Google, which have been offering voice recognition for years.

Wit might also be part of Facebook’s virtual reality strategy, which got a big boost last year when the company bought Oculus Rift. After all, how many of us are expert enough typists to hit the right keys with a visor covering our eyes?

—Larry Greenemeier

[The above text is a transcript of this podcast.]

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American