Mixed Results For Some Natural Products in Cancer Trials

Research reported at the annual meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology had good news about ginseng and flaxseed, but not for shark cartilage.

Illustration of a Bohr atom model spinning around the words Science Quickly with various science and medicine related icons around the text

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.



Some bad news and good news reported in the last week from the world of natural products therapeutics.  First, the bad news.  Shark cartilage extract showed no benefits in a study with advanced lung cancer patients.  Because shark cartilage doesn’t have blood vessels, some researchers theorized that the substance probably contains a blood vessel growth inhibitor, which might help starve tumors of nutrients.  But results presented at the annual meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology found the shark cartilage to be of no help.

Now some better news.  Another study reported at the meeting found that American ginseng helped cancer patients who suffer from extreme fatigue.  And the amount of fatigue relief was dose dependent, a good sign that it wasn’t just a placebo effect.  An upcoming trial will try to establish an exact dosage.

Finally, an NIH-funded study reported at the oncology meeting found that dietary flaxseed was effective in stopping the growth of prostate tumors.  Flaxseed is rich in omega-3 fatty acids, which may effect how cancer cells attach to other cells.  Flaxseed also contains lignans, which may interfere with the tumor’s blood vessel growth.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe