Fertilizers Are (Nearly) Forever

While most fertilizer nitrogen ends up in plants, plenty sits in the soil for decades. David Biello reports

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Without industrially created fertilizer, a third of the world's population would starve to death. Since Fritz Haber and Carl Bosch came up with a way a century ago to wrest nitrogen from the air and turn it into fertilizer for plants, food supplies have exploded.

But a lot of fertilizer applied to cropland simply washes off and fertilizes blooms of algae instead. When the bloom dies, other microbes move in to feast, in the process sucking all the oxygen out of the surrounding waters. The result: dead zones that lay waste to any sea life that could not flee. And such dead zones are proliferating.

Now research shows that a vast store of nitrogen is waiting in the soil to create new dead zones for decades to come. French scientists traced nitrogen fertilizer and found that roughly 15 percent of the nitrogen applied in 1982 was still sitting in the soil today. Their report is in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The research suggests that existing soil nitrogen could continue to flow to the sea for decades. A good reminder that our actions today have environmental consequences that our grandchildren will have to deal with.

—David Biello

[The above text is a transcript of this podcast.]

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe