Fido's Fur Fated by 3 Genes

A study in the journal Science finds that just three genes control the wide variety of fur types found on all different breeds of dogs. Karen Hopkin reports

Illustration of a Bohr atom model spinning around the words Science Quickly with various science and medicine related icons around the text

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


[The following is an exact transcript of this podcast.]

You can’t judge a book by its cover. But you can judge a dog by its coat. You can even read right through to its genes. Because a study in the August 27th online issue of Science shows that just three key genes govern the length and texture of dog fur.

Domestic dogs come in a stunning variety of shapes and sizes, and different breeds wear different coats. They can have short hair or long hair, or fur that’s straight, wavy, curly, wiry or smooth. To find the genes responsible for this furry rainbow, scientists scanned the DNA of a thousand individual dogs from 80 different breeds. And they found that every coat’s appearance boils down to three simple traits: length, curl and texture. And that each of these traits is controlled by just one gene.

So, a long-haired Golden retriever has one variant of a gene called FGF5, whereas a short-haired lab has another. By mixing and matching variants of these three genes, you get everything from a curly-haired poodle to a wire-haired Scottie with bushy eyebrows and a droopy moustache.

Which is probably more than you’ll ever need to know about the hair of the dog that bit you.

—Karen Hopkin

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe