Fighting Climate Change Also Battles Disease

Cutting down on greenhouse gas pollution could deliver health benefits. David Biello reports

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Chances are you won’t die from carbon dioxide. But cutting down on the greenhouse gas pollution responsible for climate change could extend your life and make it better. That's because less reliance on things that produce a lot of CO2, like coal-fired power plants, also means lower levels of other kinds of pollution that shorten lives.

That's according to new research in the journal Nature Climate Change.

Researchers looked at how CO2 reductions also meant less spewing into the air of fine soot and ozone, otherwise known as smog at ground level. Both soot and ozone have been linked to various respiratory and cardiovascular conditions, such as asthma and heart disease. In other words, soot and smog ain't good for you.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Cutting back on the sources of all these types of pollution would mean avoiding more than a million premature deaths by 2050. And that's a conservative estimate because it doesn't include children or anyone under 30, or other factors like the spread of tropical diseases into new regions as the globe warms.

In other words, combating climate change ain’t just good for the planet, it's good for your health.

—David Biello

[The above text is a transcript of this podcast.]

[Scientific American is part of Nature Publishing Group.]

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe