Fighting Crime with Math

Scientists at the annual meeting of the American Association for the Advancement of Science presented a mathematical model to predict criminal behavior and police success. Christie Nicholson reports

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Sometimes predicting human behavior doesn’t depend on understanding our psychology.

Researchers at the annual meeting of the American Association for the Advancement of Science in San Diego today presented a mathematical model that predicts the likelihood that a police force can conquer either a new drug market or end a rash of burglaries.

Treating criminal behavior as a deterministic system they created equations, based on Los Angeles Police Department data, that describe the movement of neighborhood crime and how cops might better control the crime rate.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The model produced two types of so-called criminal “hot spots,” which are mathematically referred to as supercritical (which is an unstable system) and subcritical (which is a stable system.)

A subcritical hot spot, like a large neighborhood drug market, can be effectively suppressed according to the model. Because this sort of hot spot requires complex organization and is not easily re-established even after police pressure is relaxed.

But a strong police presence in a supercritical hot spot doesn’t provide a lasting solution. Here, the crime hot spot simply pops up in a nearby area. Think of thieves moving through densely packed homes and quickly able to establish new targets outside the heavily policed area.

But the model’s predictions about hot spot displacement have not been observed in real life. So while the scientists are talking with the LAPD there are no plans, yet, to alter police strategy.

—Christie Nicholson

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe