Finch Scopes Out Mates with Right Eye Only

When male Gouldian finches had their right eyes covered, they lost their previous discrimination in favor of the coloration of specific females. Karen Hopkin reports

Illustration of a Bohr atom model spinning around the words Science Quickly with various science and medicine related icons around the text

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

They say that beauty is in the eye of the beholder. For male rainbow finches, that’s definitely right. As in right eye. The birds depend on their right eye for scoping out potential mates.

Many males are choosy when picking a partner. And the rainbow, or Gouldian, finch is no exception. Songbirds with colorful and variable plumage, Gouldian males tend to go for a gal with a pretty face, one that pretty much matches his. So males with black faces prefer females with the same. But that bias, it turns out, depends on how they look at her.

Researchers gave black-faced male finches a choice: they could flirt with black-faced females, red-faced females or a fellow male. Males with both eyes open cozied up to the doll with the dark feathers. But when researchers covered the males’ right eye, the males sang and danced with everyone, or hopped around randomly looking lost. You can use either eye to see the finding in the journal Biology Letters. [Jennifer J. Templeton et al., In the eye of the beholder: visual mate choice lateralization in a polymorphic songbird]


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The right eye feeds info to the left half of the brain. And so it seems, males that are really particular when it comes to choosing a partner are not in their right minds.

—Karen Hopkin

[The above text is a transcript of this podcast.]

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe