Fishes' Lateral Lines Sense Pressure and Predators

Flow sensors on the bodies of many fishes act like a hydrodynamic antenna, picking up signals about the flow of water around them. Gretchen Cuda Kroen reports 

 

Illustration of a Bohr atom model spinning around the words Science Quickly with various science and medicine related icons around the text

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


A lot of fishermen will tell you that fish have kind of a sixth sense. They avoid obstacles, effortlessly slalom between vortices or whirlpools, and hide from predators—even when they can’t see. But how do they do it?

Researchers from the University of Florida and New York University think they’ve found the answer. Nearly all fish, they say, have a similar network of sensors along their bodies that are exquisitely sensitive to changes in water pressure. The report is in the journal Physical Review Letters. [Leif Ristroph, James C. Liao and Jun Zhang, Lateral Line Layout Correlates with the Differential Hydrodynamic Pressure on Swimming Fish]

For the study, the researchers made a plastic rainbow trout with an accurate configuration of flow sensors on its body. Known as the “lateral line,” these sensors apparently act like a hydrodynamic antenna, picking up signals about the flow of water around them.

They put the fake fish in water, and simulated important real-life situations—for example, a bigger fish swimming nearby that might want to turn the trout into sushi. The researchers noted that the natural setup of the fish’s sensors includes a higher density of them on the parts of the body subject to the greatest pressure changes. So the sensory awareness of its environment is highly resolved—showing that the notion that fish have a sixth sense isn’t fishy at all.

—Gretchen Cuda Kroen

[The above text is a transcript of this podcast.]
 

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe