For Sustainability, Go Beyond Gross Domestic Product

The widely used economic measure grossly distorts the environmental and social costs of some growth, David Biello reports

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Gross domestic product, or GDP, measures goods and services produced in a given country in a given period, with a focus on growth. It's a measure many countries watch closely. 

But GDP doesn't actually tell us much about the value of natural capital, like clean air or healthy forests. Such natural goods and services, despite their great economic contributions, are largely viewed as free.

Now, the United Nations Environment Program is offering an alternative as part of the Rio+20 negotiations in Brazil this week. It’s called the Inclusive Wealth Index. The IWI  adds natural capital to the list of economic measurements in a bid to assess the sustainability of a country's growth.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


For example, China's growth drops from more than 400 percent since 1990 as measured by GDP to just 45 percent in the IWI, thanks to the decline in that country's natural resources. Other countries, like Nigeria and Russia, actually register negative growth. Talk about shifting baselines.

GDP also isn't a very good measure of whether people are benefiting from growth, as the economist who invented GDP warned in the 1930s. After all, a rise in cancer diagnoses registers as growth. But that’s growth nobody wants.

—David Biello

[The above text is an exact transcript of this podcast.]

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe