Forget Nuclear Fission, How about Fusion?

Imitating the sun remains an elusive goal for energy researchers. David Biello reports

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

[Below is the original script. But a few changes may have been made during the recording of this audio podcast.]

The sun pumps out some 383 quadrillion watts of energy every second thanks to fusion. So, it's not surprising we've been trying for the last 50 years to harness the abundant clean energy from that process

The sun simply fuses two hydrogen atoms together to produce a helium atom--and liberates energy in the process.   


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


But it takes the Sun's powerful gravity and temperatures of around 14 million degrees Celsius to get these hydrogen atoms stripped down to just their nuclei and able to fuse inside an ionized gas known as plasma.  

In fact, it will take temperatures of 100 million degrees C to get fusion going on a scale that could fit on our planet. Plus, there's the issue of turbulence.  

Like the Earth's atmosphere, plasma likes to swirl because of temperature and pressure differences from point to point. The result is storms that can cool the plasma and halt fusion.   

The International Thermonuclear Experimental Reactor or ITER to be built in Cadarache, France will rely on magnetic fields roughly 100,000 times stronger than the Earth's to contain the plasma and hold in its heat. At the right density, pressure and temperature, voilà, fusion!  

Unfortunately, all existing fusion machines require more energy to operate than they produce. And ITER will cost at least $15 billion to build.  

Fusion may have been going on in the Sun for more than four billion years but it still remains just out of reach here on Earth.

—David Biello

60-Second Earth is a weekly podcast from Scientific American. Subscribe to this Podcast: RSS | iTunes

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe