Fracking to Free Natural Gas?

A new technique to shatter shale and get the gas within offers promise--and peril. David Biello reports

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

That's the sound of

fracking—pumping a mix of water, sand and chemicals a mile or more into the Earth to shatter shale deposits and release the natural gas within.  

From the Barnett shale in Texas to the "supergiant" Marcellus shale that stretches from West Virginia to New York State, so much


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


natural gas has been found that the U.S. may have enough to burn for 100 years or more. And burning natural gas releases 43 percent less CO2 than burning coal.  

Fort Worth has transitioned from cow town to gas town. It's the booming capital of fracking with thousands of wells within city limits. But fracking comes with a cost.  

In addition to water use, there's the problem of

what to do with the brine and chemicals left over afterwards. Bad drilling lets natural gas seep up to drinking water aquifers and wells, causing some taps to literally burn . And independent testing has shown toxic gas levels hundreds of times higher than safe limits in nearby DISH, Tex.  

Fracking may have a lot of upside , but such fossil-fuel exploration and exploitation has to be done right. Or we'll have a fracking mess on our hands.

—David Biello

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe