Future Cosmologists Doomed to Err

Speaking at the annual meeting of the American Association for the Advancement of Science in Chicago on February 16th, cosmologist Lawrence Krauss said that cosmologists in the far future will misinterpret the nature of the universe because the signs of the big bang will have disappeared. Steve Mirsky reports

Illustration of a Bohr atom model spinning around the words Science Quickly with various science and medicine related icons around the text

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

[The following is an exact transcript of this podcast.]

Future cosmologists will get the universe all wrong, said Arizona State’s Lawrence Krauss at the AAAS Meeting on February 16th:

“All of the pillars of the big bang will disappear. The Hubble expansion is going to disappear. Because the galaxies we use as tracers of the Hubble expansion will disappear. There’ll be nothing to trace the expansion. You might say, well, look, we have the cosmic microwave background radiation. Too bad. Because it goes away. When the universe is 50 times its present age, the cosmic microwave background will not be able to permeate our galaxy. So even if observers were smart enough to measure things much weaker than we can measure today, it wouldn’t be there to measure.

“The scientific picture of the universe a hundred years ago was that it was static and eternal in which we live in an island universe, our galaxy surrounded by empty space. And that’s the picture we’ve changed radically due to all of our observations. And I want to point out the far future is going to bring a return to exactly that picture. Observers in the far future will use the best science they can come up with to determine the nature of the universe and they will come up with exactly the wrong answer.”

—Steve Mirsky 


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Editor's note: Lawrence Krauss and Robert Scherrer wrote "The End of Cosmology" for our February 2008 issue.

60-Second Science is a daily podcast. Subscribe to this Podcast:

RSS | iTunes 

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe