New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Gamma-Ray Burst Fingered for Carbon 14 Spike in A.D. 774

Tree-ring data from A.D. 774 show a sudden spike in radioactive carbon 14, pointing to a burst of charged particles or high-energy radiation that struck Earth. A relatively nearby gamma-ray burst could be the culprit. John Matson reports

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

The year is 774 A.D. A blast of energy from outer space hits Earth. No one alive then seems to have been aware of it. But the event was recorded—in the trees. Last year researchers announced that tree-ring data from 774 and 775 show a sudden spike in radioactive carbon 14. The uptick points to a burst of charged particles or high-energy radiation that struck Earth. But what caused it?

One suggestion is that a supernova could be the culprit. And medieval texts do record the appearance of a “red crucifix” glowing in the night sky, although the timing is uncertain. 

Another astrophysical possibility is a short gamma-ray burst, researchers report in the Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. [Valeri Hambaryan and Ralph Neuhäuser, A Galactic short gamma-ray burst as cause for the 14C peak in AD 774/5] Short gamma-ray bursts occur when super-dense objects—say, two neutron stars—merge, giving off a quick blast of radiation.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


As long as it was a few thousand light-years away, a short gamma-ray burst in the galaxy might not have caused great harm. And they don’t glow much in visible light, so it’s possible that no one would notice. One problem with the theory? Short gamma-ray bursts appear to be extremely rare in our galaxy. On second thought, that’s probably a good thing.

—John Matson

[The above text is a transcript of this podcast.]

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe