Gamma-Ray Burst Fingered for Carbon 14 Spike in A.D. 774

Tree-ring data from A.D. 774 show a sudden spike in radioactive carbon 14, pointing to a burst of charged particles or high-energy radiation that struck Earth. A relatively nearby gamma-ray burst could be the culprit. John Matson reports

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

The year is 774 A.D. A blast of energy from outer space hits Earth. No one alive then seems to have been aware of it. But the event was recorded—in the trees. Last year researchers announced that tree-ring data from 774 and 775 show a sudden spike in radioactive carbon 14. The uptick points to a burst of charged particles or high-energy radiation that struck Earth. But what caused it?

One suggestion is that a supernova could be the culprit. And medieval texts do record the appearance of a “red crucifix” glowing in the night sky, although the timing is uncertain. 

Another astrophysical possibility is a short gamma-ray burst, researchers report in the Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. [Valeri Hambaryan and Ralph Neuhäuser, A Galactic short gamma-ray burst as cause for the 14C peak in AD 774/5] Short gamma-ray bursts occur when super-dense objects—say, two neutron stars—merge, giving off a quick blast of radiation.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


As long as it was a few thousand light-years away, a short gamma-ray burst in the galaxy might not have caused great harm. And they don’t glow much in visible light, so it’s possible that no one would notice. One problem with the theory? Short gamma-ray bursts appear to be extremely rare in our galaxy. On second thought, that’s probably a good thing.

—John Matson

[The above text is a transcript of this podcast.]

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe