Gee Whiz, Why Not Recycle Urine for Drinking Water?

The U.S. can no longer afford to ignore sewage as a source of drinking water, scientists argue. David Biello reports

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Americans produce 32 billion gallons of sewage every day. And we need to start drinking it. After treating it, of course. So argues a report from the U.S. National Research Council. Why drink reprocessed pee? Because freshwater supplies are getting squeezed

The reports’ scientists, utility officials and engineers note that new technologies are making it affordable to clean up and reclaim such water. And it's not just for drinking—reclaimed water can also be used for irrigation or industry. 

The best news? The possible health risks "do not exceed and, in some cases may be significantly lower than, the risks of existing water supplies."  


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Many of us are already drinking such recycled water. After all, if you're downriver from another municipality odds are your drinking water has already been through their treatment plants—and every other city's upriver from you. 

Of course, there are other things we should be recovering from our wastewater, such as the vital nutrient phosphorus that may soon become scarce. But in a world that's having trouble providing enough water for everybody, recycling makes sense. If we can just overcome the blehhh factor.

—David Biello

[The above text is a transcript of this podcast.] 

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe