New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Giant Tsunami Remnants Spotted on Mars

Evidence indicates that waves as tall as skyscrapers and thousands of kilometers wide once washed over the Red Planet.

 

Illustration of a Bohr atom model spinning around the words Science Quickly with various science and medicine related icons around the text

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

For as long as we’ve been sending spacecraft to Mars, we’ve been finding signs of water. The Red Planet’s sinuous river valleys, flood-carved canyons and buried glaciers all hint that it was wet billions of years ago.

Some researchers think that the curiously flat and sparsely cratered northern lowlands are the remnants of a once-great ocean. But that ocean’s proposed coast varies in height by thousands of meters, which has made the idea controversial.

Now, a team of researchers has found evidence for ancient tsunamis on Mars, evidence that supports the idea of a vanished Martian ocean and explains its vertically variable shoreline.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


“We were trying to find shorelines on Mars like those we typically see on Earth, which is consistently distributed along a constant elevation. And that is not what we have found on Mars, because in the case of Mars the shorelines were buried beneath the tsunami deposits.”

Alexis Rodriguez of the Planetary Science Institute in Tucson. He led a team that used satellite images to identify thick deposits of boulders and silt apparently left by two separate tsunamis, a few million years apart, almost three-and-a-half billion years ago.

“The discovery of the tsunami deposits represents definite evidence for the existence of the early Martian ocean….the tsunamis were enormous. On average we estimate they were about 50 meters in height, but at some locations they could have reached as much as 120 meters...and the surface areas that the tsunamis covered within the study region are also huge…each tsunami had roughly the combined areas of California, Nevada and Oregon.”

The most plausible cause for such massive tsunamis was asteroids or comets slamming into the Martian ocean. The study is in the journal Scientific Reports. [J. Alexis P. Rodriguez et al., Tsunami waves extensively resurfaced the shorelines of an early Martian ocean]

The tsunamis could provide crucial information about the habitability of ancient Mars. The first one occurred when the planet must have been relatively warm and amenable for life, because it carved out backwash channels as it returned to the sea. By contrast, the planet had become much cooler by the time the second tsunami hit—the waters apparently flash-froze after flowing onto the surface.

Examining additional tsunami deposits could reveal much more data about Mars’s ancient climate changes. Someday, rovers—or astronauts—might even visit the deposits, looking for evidence of past marine life locked in frozen waves.

—Lee Billings

[The above text is a transcript of this podcast.]

[Scientific American is part of Springer Nature.]

Lee Billings is a science journalist specializing in astronomy, physics, planetary science, and spaceflight and is senior desk for physical science at Scientific American. He is author of a critically acclaimed book, Five Billion Years of Solitude: The Search for Life Among the Stars, which in 2014 won a Science Communication Award from the American Institute of Physics. In addition to his work for Scientific American, Billings’s writing has appeared in the New York Times, the Wall Street Journal, the Boston Globe, Wired, New Scientist, Popular Science and many other publications. Billings joined Scientific American in 2014 and previously worked as a staff editor at SEED magazine. He holds a B.A. in journalism from the University of Minnesota.

More by Lee Billings

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe