Good Gut Bacteria May Keep Bad at Bay

Mice given a healthy colony of human gut bacteria were able to ward off infections by pathogen E. coli bacteria. Christopher Intagliata reports

Illustration of a Bohr atom model spinning around the words Science Quickly with various science and medicine related icons around the text

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Most E. coli bacteria are harmless. It’s the rare, pathogenic strains that can cause bloody diarrhea, kidney disease, or death. But many of us may already be carrying the antidote—a healthy colony of gut bacteria. Because a study finds that when bad E. coli get in, beneficial microbes appear to keep them at bay. In mice, at least.

Researchers raised rodents in a sterile environment—meaning the animals are bacteria-free. Then some were inoculated with a probiotic cocktail of human gut bacteria. After that they all got a dose of pathogenic E. coli—the strain behind last year's spinach outbreak. The mice who got the preemptive probiotics never got sick. Their gut bacteria appeared to whisk away the toxins produced by E. coli.

Their probiotic-free counterparts were less lucky. Within a week of being infected with the pathogen they got kidney disease. The researchers presented those findings at a meeting of the American Society for Microbiology, in Denver. [Kathryn A. Eaton et al., Role of the Intestinal Microbiota in Disease Due to Enterohemorrhagic E. coli in Germ Free Mice]


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


So it’s possible antibiotics could be joined by probiotics as future treatments for bacterial infections. And that you may already be enlisting gut bacteria to fight off E. coli infections. Call it a gut feeling.

—Christopher Intagliata

[The above text is a transcript of this podcast.]

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe