Grain Use Well before Modern Agriculture

A study in the journal Science finds evidence that early modern humans were making use of grains, which required significant processing before eating, 100,000 years ago. Cynthia Graber reports

Illustration of a Bohr atom model spinning around the words Science Quickly with various science and medicine related icons around the text

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Some of our early ancestors weren’t just scavenging fruit and nuts and hunting animals. That’s the conclusion of scientists who discovered evidence of the grain sorghum on hundred-thousand-year-old stone tools. The tools were discovered deep in a cave in northwest Mozambique. The research appears in the December 18th issue of the journal Science.

The general belief had been that these ancient people in southern Africa preferred to concentrate on more accessible foods, such as fruit, nuts and roots. They wouldn’t have bothered with seeds and starchy grains, it was thought, because those foods were too difficult to get and prepare. In this scenario, grains would become a regular part of the diet much later in history.

But a researcher [Julio Mercader], from the University of Calgary, decided to survey 70 stone tools found in one of the deep chambers of a long cave. And about 80 percent of the tools contained residues of grains. Grinding and scraping tools showed the most grain evidence. And the grains appear to have been highly processed: boiled, fermented or ground.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Sorghum is still used widely today in Africa. Now it looks as if it might be part of the original family recipe.

—Cynthia Graber

For more news on old grains, see Humans feasting on grains for at least 100,000 years 

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe