The Hangover: Part N+1

Developing a hangover doesn't prevent or even significantly delay the next drinking bout. Sophie Bushwick reports 

 

Illustration of a Bohr atom model spinning around the words Science Quickly with various science and medicine related icons around the text

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


“I'm never drinking again. And this time I mean it!
 
Anyone who's suffered through a bad hangover has muttered these words. But does a hangover even delay your next drink?
 
Scientists recruited almost 400 adults who consumed alcohol at least once a week. At the beginning of the study, the participants answered questions about alcohol and nicotine dependence. Afterwards, they kept drinking diaries for three weeks. They also kept morning and bedtime reports on their mental status and stress level.
 
To see if hangovers inspired participants to delay their next binge, researchers measured the time between drinking episodes. On average, hangovers did postpone the next drink—but only by about six hours. The work is published in the journal Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research. [Amee J. Epler et al, Does Hangover Influence the Time to Next Drink? An Investigation Using Ecological Momentary Assessment]
 
In addition to discovering that hangovers fail to deter drinking, the study found that people with alcohol dependence or financial stress were more likely to develop hangovers. And of course, the only way to prevent hangovers entirely was to limit drinking. Cheers!

—Sophie Bushwick

[The above text is a transcript of this podcast.]
 

Sophie Bushwick was formerly the technology editor at Scientific American. She makes frequent appearances on radio shows such as Science Friday and television networks, including CBS, MSNBC and National Geographic. She has more than a decade of experience as a science journalist based in New York City and previously worked at outlets such as Popular Science,Discover and Gizmodo. Follow Bushwick on X (formerly Twitter) @sophiebushwick

More by Sophie Bushwick

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe