New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Heat ID'd as Subtle Cause of Rockfalls

Rockfalls without an obvious cause (like an earthquake or expanding ice) may be due to hot daily air temperatures expanding small cracks in cliff faces.  

 

Illustration of a Bohr atom model spinning around the words Science Quickly with various science and medicine related icons around the text

The floor of Yosemite Valley is littered with piles of rocks that crumbled off the park’s iconic cliffs. These rockfalls happen all the time, because Yosemite’s granite walls are riddled with cracks produced by geologic stress. Scientists know the rockfalls can be triggered by things like earthquakes, rainfall, and freezing and thawing ice. But many falls occur without an obvious cause. Now researchers think that heat may be the culprit.

“We noticed that there had been a bunch of rockfalls that were happening in the summertime, on particularly hot days.” Brian Collins, a research civil engineer with the U.S. Geological Survey. “And we noticed when we looked at the timing that they were happening in the afternoon, when we thought the temperatures were at their hottest.”

Collins and Greg Stock, Yosemite’s park geologist, wanted to know if small rock movements, induced by changing temperatures, might weaken cracks and contribute to rockfalls. So the researchers—who are both climbers—found a suitable fracture near the base of a 500-meter-tall cliff and installed instruments called crackmeters, which monitored the width of the crack over time.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The devices revealed that the crack grew almost a centimeter wider during the warmest part of the day. It shrank again when temperatures cooled off, for instance, at night and during the winter. But overall, the scientists found that the average width of the fracture grew over the course of a summer and over the entire three and a half-year study period, bringing the crack closer to breaking.

“We think that what happened was that every cycle — as the rock goes back and forth and back and forth — you’re getting to a part that we call subcritical crack growth. And that means that the crack where the rock is attached to the cliff is actually fracturing at a microscopic level. And so if you do that over the course of a year, then eventually you’re going to do some permanent damage to those points of attachment.”

The study is in the journal Nature Geoscience. [Brian D. Collins and Greg M. Stock, Rockfall triggering by cyclic thermal stressing of exfoliation fractures]

The slab of rock the scientists studied hasn’t fallen yet, and Collins doesn’t know how many cycles it will take before this or any other fracture finally breaks. When it does, the trigger might be a particularly sweltering day, when the partially detached slab is farthest away from the cliff. Or it could be another process, helped along by the fact that temperature changes already weakened the crack.

Either way, the results will help researchers assess the rockfall hazard in steep, rugged terrain. Because now they know when the mercury goes up, rocks are more likely to come down.

—Julia Rosen

[The above text is a transcript of this podcast.]

[Scientific American is part of Springer Nature.]

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe