Heel-to-Toe Walking Is Energy Efficient
A study in the Journal of Experimental Biology looked at the energetics of walking the way most other animals do, that is, on either the balls of the feet or on the toes. Walking heel to toe is, for humans, much more efficient. Karen Hopkin reports
SUBSCRIBE TO Science Quickly
On supporting science journalism
If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.
It’s good to keep on your toes. Metaphorically, that is. Not when you’re actually out for a stroll. Because a new study suggests that it takes nearly twice as much energy to walk on your toes than it does to land on your heel.
Humans are among a small handful of animals that tend to strut heel-to-toe. Chimps and other apes do it, as do bears. But most critters bounce on the balls of their feet—think cats and dogs—while others trot on their toes, like horses and deer.
To find out whether our gait gives us any advantages, scientists asked 27 volunteers to walk on a treadmill all three ways: heel-first, ball-of-the-foot first, or up on tippy toes. The participants also wore face masks that enabled the researchers to measure their oxygen consumption. The results: the subjects walking on the balls of their feet, in addition to looking ridiculous, expended 50 percent more energy. The ones prancing on their toes needed 83 percent more energy. The study is in the Journal of Experimental Biology.
The bottom line: landing on our heels provides more leverage and limits energy losses to the ground. And does not look like a tribute to classic Monty Python.
—Karen Hopkin
[The above text is an exact transcript of this podcast.]
It’s Time to Stand Up for Science
If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.
I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.
If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.
In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.
There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.
