Hermit Crabs Remodel Shells with Predators in Mind

A hermit crab removes material from a new shell to make it more spacious, but it stops short of weakening it to a predator's crushing ability. Christopher Intagliata reports

Illustration of a Bohr atom model spinning around the words Science Quickly with various science and medicine related icons around the text

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Lots of animals build homes for protection—think beaver lodges or termite mounds. Hermit crabs, on the other hand, inhabit hand-me-down homes. But they remodel them first, carving out shells to make them lighter and twice as spacious as the originals. Those creature comforts come at a cost, though—because hollowed-out shells can be more easily crushed in the jaws of a predator.

Researchers wanted to find out if hermit crabs take that crucial detail into consideration. So they gave over a thousand new sea snail shells to hermit crabs in Costa Rica. A year later they recovered the used ones. Then they crushed them.

As expected, remodeled shells broke twice as easily as new ones. But the strength it took to smash them was still just a bit more than local raccoons can muster—meaning crabs may remodel with their predator's bite in mind. The results are in the Journal of the Royal Society Interface. [Mark E. Laidre, Eli Patten and Lisa Pruitt, Costs of a more spacious home after remodelling by hermit crabs]


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The benefits of the fixer-upper larger home are many: females lay more eggs, males grow burlier and crabs can avoid nasty squabbles with competitors for a real estate upgrade. And they don’t even have to shell out much.

—Christopher Intagliata

[The above text is a transcript of this podcast.]
 

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe