New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Hippo Dung Fouls Up Freshwater Fisheries

Hippo poop is piling up in Tanzania’s freshwater fisheries—which is bad news for biodiversity, and deleterious for the dinner plate. Jason G. Goldman reports. 

Illustration of a Bohr atom model spinning around the words Science Quickly with various science and medicine related icons around the text

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

They weigh about 3,000 pounds and eat about 100 pounds of plants each day. So your average adult hippo produces quite a lot of poop. By some estimates, a single hippo blasts out more than 10 pounds of waste each day. 

And all that hippo dung gets mixed into the ponds and streams where they spend most of their time. We generally think of this process as beneficial, an ecosystem service, a way for nutrients to flow from terrestrial, streamside ecosystems into the water itself. Their dung is a sort of fertilizer for aquatic life.

And all of that is true—at least when water moves from pond to pond. At one time, many African waterways continued to flow even during the dry season. But people have diverted lots of that water for agriculture. So now, Tanzania's Great Ruaha River stops flowing during the dry season, leaving behind a serious of stagnant pools—in which the hippos keep on pooping. 


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


"Especially in these high density pools at the peak the dry season, there's a huge buildup of dung. So we ended up pulling up these nets that have no fish but are just filled with hippo dung."

University of California, Santa Barbara, ecologist Keenan Stears. Unable to wash downriver, the nutrients build up while dissolved oxygen in the water decreases. 

"Changes in the chemistry can influence biodiversity within these pools as well. Specifically, fish as well as aquatic invertebrates."

Only a few types of fish can survive in these oxygen-poor aquatic environments for more than a few weeks. It's bad news for biodiversity, but it's also deleterious for the dinner plate. Tilapia are an important source of protein for communities that rely on the rivers for their food. Hippos reduced tilapia abundance by 41% across the watershed the researchers studied. The results were published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. [Keenan Stears et al., Effects of the hippopotamus on the chemistry and ecology of a changing watershed.]

There is some hope, though. When the wet season returns and the rivers start to flow again, things can return to normal—if we're careful.

"But what our results do show is its not all doom and gloom. This resetting of the system when flow resumes shows that there is some kind of resilience within the system. And if we are able to manage the off-take of water from these rivers, the system is able to actually recover in terms of repopulating these pools in terms of biodiversity and abundance."

—Jason G. Goldman

 [The above text is a transcript of this podcast.]

Jason G. Goldman is a science journalist based in Los Angeles. He has written about animal behavior, wildlife biology, conservation, and ecology for Scientific American, Los Angeles magazine, the Washington Post, the Guardian, the BBC, Conservation magazine, and elsewhere. He contributes to Scientific American's "60-Second Science" podcast, and is co-editor of Science Blogging: The Essential Guide (Yale University Press). He enjoys sharing his wildlife knowledge on television and on the radio, and often speaks to the public about wildlife and science communication.

More by Jason G. Goldman

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe