Hot Rocks Were Technology Revolution

A study in the journal Science suggests that early humans were fire-treating stone more than 70,000 years ago to make better stone tools. Cynthia Graber reports

Illustration of a Bohr atom model spinning around the words Science Quickly with various science and medicine related icons around the text

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

[The following is an exact transcript of this podcast.]

Early modern humans didn’t just chip away at stones to create their tools. They treated stone with fire in a sophisticated fashion, according to research published August 14th in the journal Science.

About 72,000 years ago, our ancestors along coastal South Africa made tools from silcrete, a cement-like layer of soil. The silcrete found at archaeological sites was glossy with a fine grain and a reddish color. It didn’t match stones in local outcroppings. Researchers from the University of Cape Town couldn’t find big enough pieces to learn more, until a couple of years ago. Then a colleague from Arizona State University remarked that a piece of silcrete reminded him of heat-treated tools in the Southwest.

So the researchers set up a fire pit and buried a silcrete sample at high temperature. The next day, the stone looked like ones used by early humans. It flaked easily and provided the basic material for complex tools. Until now, heat treatment was thought to have started in Europe 25,000 years ago. This discovery pushes it back tens of thousands of years into Africa—and suggests that the southern African coast may have been the site of a truly Promethean revolution.

—Cynthia Graber


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


For more on this hot story, see Cooked Results: Modern Toolmaker Uses Fire to Solve 72,000-Year-Old Mystery

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe