How Jupiter's Red Spot Stays Great

A three-dimensional analysis offers an explanation for how Jupiter's Great Red Spot hasn't petered out. Karen Hopkin reports.

Illustration of a Bohr atom model spinning around the words Science Quickly with various science and medicine related icons around the text

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Jupiter’s Great Red Spot. It’s one of the most familiar sites in our solar system. It’s also one of the most mysterious. Because, based on most calculations, this flashy display of swirling gases should be long gone. Now, scientists think they know the secret to the storm’s endurance. Which they reveal at a meeting of the American Physical Society’s Division of Fluid Dynamics in Pittsburgh. [Pedram Hassanzadeh and Philip Marcus, On the Unexpected Longevity of the Great Red Spot, Oceanic Eddies, and other Baroclinic Vortices]

The Great Red Spot is like a humongous hurricane. But one that’s raged for hundreds of years. Most models find that turbulence and heat loss should have bled away the spot’s energy. And a pair of nearby jet streams, which flow in opposite directions, should have slowed its spin. So how is it still there?

In the latest analysis, researchers built a 3D model of the Great Red Spot and really gave all three dimensions their due. They discovered that as the spot’s horizontal winds are depleted, a vertical flow of gas from above and below keeps feeding it energy. And a circular flow sucks energy from those jet streams and diverts it into the storm. All of which keeps the red spot great, by Jove.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


--Karen Hopkin

[The above text is a transcript of this podcast.]

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe