How the Koala Got Its Low Voice

The koala makes a sound that should require a bison-size body. A descended larynx gives it an unusually long vocal tract. Sophie Bushwick reports

Illustration of a Bohr atom model spinning around the words Science Quickly with various science and medicine related icons around the text

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

To vocalize, animals create sound waves in their pipe-like vocal tracts. Shorter pipes produce higher-frequency sounds, so small animals like the cuddly koala should have high voices. [koala sound] Or not.

A new study suggests that male koalas developed this low mating call to impress females with their size—even if they’re not quite as large as their bellows boast. The koala’s baritone is low enough to come from a 50-centimeter pipe, which should require a body larger than a bison.

Instead, males developed deceptively low voices by evolving a descended larynx, which means the voice box sits lower in the throat. This lengthens the vocal tract, which stretches between voice box and mouth, giving the koala a longer “pipe” and lower voice without a bigger body. The finding is in the Journal of Experimental Biology. [Benjamin Charlton et al., "Cues to body size in the formant spacing of male koala (Phascolarctos cinereus) bellows: Honesty in an exaggerated trait"]

Koala calls may be misleading, but larger males have even lower voices than their runtier counterparts. Which allows females to identify bigger, stronger mates. To these fuzzy bellowers, size does matter.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


—Sophie Bushwick

[The above text is a transcript of this podcast.]

[Koala audio courtesy of Benjamin Charlton.]

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe