How to Make a Mass Extinction

Journalist and author Peter Brannen talks about his book The Ends of the World: Volcanic Apocalypses, Lethal Oceans, and Our Quest to Understand Earth’s Past Mass Extinctions.

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Welcome to Scientific American’s Science Talk, posted on January 30, 2020. I’m Steve Mirsky.

On this episode:

[BRANNEN CLIP]


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


That’s Peter Brannen. On his Web site, he describes himself as a placental mammal. But he’s also an award-winning journalist and the author of the book The Ends of the World: Volcanic Apocalypses, Lethal Oceans, and Our Quest to Understand Earth’s Past Mass Extinctions—a book that the journal Science called “[A] surprisingly lyrical investigation of Earth’s mass extinctions.” He was in New York City recently, and we sat down together to talk about the book. Midway through our discussion, we’ll take a break for a short segment sponsored by the Kavli Prize with Stanford neuroscientist Carla Shatz—which, perhaps surprisingly, has some connections with the discussion of mass extinctions. And now: Peter Brannen.

[BRANNEN 1]

We’ll return to Peter Brannen after this short break from the Kavli Prize.

[SHATZ SEGMENT]

And now back to Peter Brannen and the last three mass extinctions.

[BRANNEN 2]

That’s it for this episode. Get your science news at our Web site, www.ScientificAmerican.com, where you’ll also find a couple of dozen articles about past mass extinctions, as well as coverage about the possibility of the next one.

And follow us on Twitter, where you’ll get a tweet whenever a new item hits the Web site. Our twitter name is @sciam. For Scientific American’s Science Talk, I’m Steve Mirsky. Thanks for clicking on us.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe