Humans off the Hook for Alaskan Mastodon Extinction

A reexamination of museum mastodon specimens provides evidence that that last ones were gone from what's called the Beringia region well before any humans showed up. Emily Schwing reports     

 

Illustration of a Bohr atom model spinning around the words Science Quickly with various science and medicine related icons around the text

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


It’s long been thought mammoths and mastodons rambled over North America’s arctic and subarctic realms between 75,000 and 100,000 years ago, and were made extinct by hungry new arrivals on the scene: human beings. But new evidence indicates mastodons probably roamed the region as far back as 120,000 years ago—and they were gone before the first people showed up.

“For at the least the story of the mastodon, we now know for what we call Beringia—Alaska, parts of Yukon and over into northeastern Asia—they were wiped out in those areas for things that had nothing to do with humans, because they all died out before there were humans there.” Pat Druckenmiller is the Curator of Earth Science at the University of Alaska Museum of the North. “Humans could not have been part of the story and that’s pretty interesting.”

The research is in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. [Grant D. Zazula et al, American mastodon extirpation in the Arctic and Subarctic predates human colonization and terminal Pleistocene climate change]

Druckenmiller and co-authors were led to these conclusions after colleagues at the Yukon Paleontology Program in Canada decided to redate nearly 40 specimens, because American mastodons are often mistaken for their much hairier wooly mammoth cousins, who hung around the area later.
 
“A mammoth and a mastodon can be immediately distinguished on the basis of their teeth, their big cheek teeth.” The surface of a mammoth tooth looks like a washboard, perfect for grinding grasses that grew during the last ice age. But mastodon teeth have much lumpier, bumpier cusps: ideal for chewing twigs and leaves.
 
“People in the past when they found these teeth and bones, they put glue and other kinds of strange things on them, and that glue can mess up the dates, gives you a wrong date. In fact, it gives you a date that’s too young.”
 
The new dates corroborate what mastodon teeth show: They ambled over Beringia when the region was warmer and forested, long before mammoths and earlier than humans. So, if humans didn’t wipe out the mastodon, what did? That mystery remains for scientists to sink their teeth into.
 
—Emily Schwing
 
[The above text is a transcript of this podcast.]
 

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe