Hurricane Sandy Tracked by Flickr Photo Stream

The number of Sandy photos posted to Flickr spiked exactly when the atmospheric pressure plummeted, and Sandy made landfall. Christopher Intagliata reports

Illustration of a Bohr atom model spinning around the words Science Quickly with various science and medicine related icons around the text

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Scientists already have lots of tools to track hurricanes: radar, satellite images, "Hurricane Hunter" aircraft. But now there's a new one: the photo-sharing site Flickr.

Researchers searched Flickr for photos taken in October and November 2012 whose tags, titles or descriptions included "Hurricane Sandy," "Sandy," or "hurricane." They plotted when each photo was taken, and compared that to a graph of atmospheric pressure in New Jersey in the same period. Turns out, the number of Sandy photos spiked at 8pm Eastern time on October 29th—exactly when atmospheric pressure plummeted, and Sandy made landfall. That analysis appears in the journal Scientific Reports. [Tobias Preis et al., Quantifying the Digital Traces of Hurricane Sandy on Flickr]

Of course, it may seem obvious that as winds picked up and Sandy hit the coast, there were more downed trees and property damage to photograph. But media hype could have also pushed more people to pay attention—and take photos—during the storm's peak. Either way, researchers say crowd-sourced storm data might give governments, insurance companies, and emergency responders a way to gauge a storm's progress and impact, in a way that weather data might not reveal. Assuming internet and cell service is up and running, of course.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


—Christopher Intagliata

[The above text is a transcript of this podcast.]

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe