New Issue: Science’s Impossible Questions. Read Now

If Time Is Money, Then Free Time Is Frustrating

If we think of time as money, we might be undermining our ability to enjoy free time. Christie Nicholson reports

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

“Time is money” sounds like an efficient strategy. But such a perspective could undermine your overall happiness, according to a study in The Journal of Experimental Social Psychology (pdf)

Researchers surveyed subjects about their state of happiness before and after several experiments.

In one, subjects were asked to calculate their income as an hourly wage. They later reported less happiness from spending leisure time surfing the net, compared with people not asked to calculate hourly income.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


In another test, subjects spent their leisure time listening to the opera Lakme. Again, those who thought of time as dollars reported more anxiety than did those who had not tied time to money.  

But this decrease in happiness was mediated in a third experiment when subjects got paid to listen to the music. Which suggests that it’s the feeling of losing money during leisure activities that causes the drop in enjoyment.

The research indicates that thinking about time in terms of money changes the way we experience time. And may leave us too impatient to smell the roses—a truly costly outcome. 

—Christie Nicholson

[The above text is a transcript of this podcast.]  

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe