Including Indigenous Voices in Genomics

A program at the University of Illinois trains indigenous scientists in genomics—in hopes that future work will be aimed at benefiting those communities. Christine Herman reports. 

Illustration of a Bohr atom model spinning around the words Science Quickly with various science and medicine related icons around the text

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Some scientists want to use the DNA of indigenous people to reconstruct the “human migration story”: the history of how people spread from Africa to everywhere.

But many in the indigenous community who’ve contributed their DNA for science feel these types of studies are exploitative—and say they don’t like being left out of the conversation.

“There’s a long history [of] anthropologists and scientists going to indigenous communities, getting what they need, leaving and never coming back.”


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


University of Illinois anthropologist Ripan Malhi. 

“I learned early on that that was the norm in science and anthropology up until recently.”

To help change that system, in 2011 Malhi launched a program that provides hands-on genomics training to Native American and other indigenous scientists—and laypeople. It’s called SING (Summer Internship for Indigenous Peoples in Genomics). 

“We discuss all week about genomics and how it can be used as a tool and how it may fit or not fit with indigenous ideas and knowledge. We have discussions on how to decolonize science, and then we do a large number of discussions about ethical, legal and social implications.”

This year’s SING workshop wrapped up earlier this month. Krystal Tsosie is a Navajo geneticist and one of the organizers.

“SING has been influential in training the next generation of indigenous scientists, so that we can ensure that science is done by us, for us—and truly benefits us.” 

Tsosie says she’s the only indigenous Ph.D. student in science at Vanderbilt [University], and the SING workshop has helped her feel less isolated. 

“Getting that sort of sense of community from my indigenous peers who are undergoing the same sort of challenges in academia is great.”

SING has trained more than 120 participants to date. In 2018 alumni and faculty published ethical guidelines for scientists on how to approach genomics research in a way that is sensitive to the interests of indigenous people and that can benefit their communities.

Malhi says he now approaches his work with indigenous communities as a collaboration.

“I work with the communities to figure out what they want to study, as well as what we want to study, and basically partner with them.”

In her research, Tsosie studies pregnancy complications among Ojibwe women in North Dakota and how environmental factors contribute to disease among indigenous communities in South Dakota.

She says partnering with Indigenous people is critical ...

“... to ensure that genomics research that involves indigenous people will actually benefit us, as opposed to just using us as subjects, as we have in the past.”

—Christine Herman

[The above text is a transcript of this podcast.]

[A version of this story originally ran on Illinois Public Media, the NPR member station serving east-central Illinois.]

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe