New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Individuals' Blood Glucose Levels after Meals May Be Predictable

Closely tracking 800 people's blood glucose levels in response to meals allowed researchers to develop a predictive algorithm for individuals

 

PhotoDisc/Getty Images (MARS)

Illustration of a Bohr atom model spinning around the words Science Quickly with various science and medicine related icons around the text

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

High blood sugar levels are a risk factor for type 2 diabetes. Doctors today have only general dietary recommendations for how to control those levels, because there’s no real way to predict what’s called the post-prandial glycemic response—that is, just how your particular blood glucose level will be affected by what you eat. But a new study may be the start of making glucose-controlling food recommendations more personal.  

Scientists in Israel followed 800 nondiabetic adults over one week, checking their blood glucose levels every five minutes. The participants got a full medical workup, including a stool sample to analyze their gut microbiome.

The participants logged the food they ate, their exercise and their sleep. They chose their own food except for one meal a day, which was one of four standardized options.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The result? “The blood sugar response of different people to identical meals can be hugely different.” Eran Segal of the Weizmann Institute of Science. Segal and his colleagues found that one person’s blood glucose might spike in response to a particular food, while that same food would actually lower another person’s. The study is in the journal Cell. [David Zeevi et al, Personalized Nutrition by Prediction of Glycemic Responses]

The researchers then developed an algorithm that could predict an individual’s blood sugar responses to various meals.

“We link nutrition in a personalized manner to human risk to develop elevated blood sugar levels and their many complications.” Eran Elinav of the Weizzman Institute, who also took part in the study. “As scientists we often deal with very basic questions, but in this work we are very happy to also introduce a potential that if further developed would allow to benefit the health of millions across the world.”

—Cynthia Graber

[The above text is a transcript of this podcast.]

Cynthia Graber is a print and radio journalist who covers science, technology, agriculture, and any other stories in the U.S. or abroad that catch her fancy. She's won a number of national awards for her radio documentaries, including the AAAS Kavli Science Journalism Award, and is the co-host of the food science podcast Gastropod. She was a Knight Science Journalism fellow at MIT.

More by Cynthia Graber

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe