Insurance for Global Catastrophes, Whether Asteroids or Climate Change

Spend a little more time observing meteors or combating climate change, spend a little less time worrying about global catastrophes. David Biello reports

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

It's hard to miss an asteroid the size of a truck exploding with all the force of a nuclear bomb. Such a space rock boiled across the sky near Chelyabinsk in southern Russia on February 15.

Space objects are a constant threat to Earth. In the worst case, the dust cloud from a major impact could shut down photosynthesis. No matter how much carbon dioxide humanity spews into the atmosphere, we may be powerless to prevent a kind of nuclear winter from the impact of an even bigger object, like 2012 DA14 which just passed within 17,200 miles of Earth.

That's closer than some of our Earth-observing satellites.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Big impacts have been trouble for life on Earth since the beginning, perhaps holding back life's first outbreak and pressing the reset button again and again throughout the planet's history. Just as it makes sense to take out an insurance policy against climate change, it makes sense to take out an insurance policy against spaceborne threats by spending a little bit more on the kinds of satellites and telescopes that can spot them.

Of course, the U.S. has been spending less on such observations in recent years. Our inability to adequately see ahead may yet prove our undoing, whether at our own hands or via the kind of massive meteorite that killed the dinosaurs.

—David Biello

[The above text is a transcript of this podcast.]

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe