Invention Could Scope Out Counterfeit Drugs

PharmaCheck relies on microfluidics to test tiny amounts of a drug to make sure it contains the active ingredient. Cynthia Graber reports.

Illustration of a Bohr atom model spinning around the words Science Quickly with various science and medicine related icons around the text

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Malaria kills hundreds of thousands of people in Africa annually, and it sickens millions more. Medicine can keep the disease in check and save lives. But up to half the drugs in Africa may be substandard—and up to a third may be counterfeit. At the moment, there’s no easy way to reliably test a drug in the field.

That could change if a new technology called PharmaCheck, developed by researchers at Boston University, moves from prototype to reality.

The pill in question is dissolved in liquid. Miniscule amounts of the liquid pass through channels in what’s called a microfluidic chip. The channels include a molecule that will bond to the real drug. That event produces fluorescence that can be measured by a smartphone app—which reveals how much of the drug is present and active in the pill.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The technology was recently awarded one of nine grants by the National Collegiate Inventors and Innovators Alliance. The research team plans to soon test prototypes in the field in Ghana.

If PharmaCheck works, regulators and pharmacists could have a simple, inexpensive method to determine whether a drug is effective. Which could impede counterfeiters and save thousands of lives.

—Cynthia Graber

[The above text is a transcript of this podcast.]

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe