New Issue: Science’s Impossible Questions. Read Now

Invention Could Scope Out Counterfeit Drugs

PharmaCheck relies on microfluidics to test tiny amounts of a drug to make sure it contains the active ingredient. Cynthia Graber reports.

Illustration of a Bohr atom model spinning around the words Science Quickly with various science and medicine related icons around the text

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Malaria kills hundreds of thousands of people in Africa annually, and it sickens millions more. Medicine can keep the disease in check and save lives. But up to half the drugs in Africa may be substandard—and up to a third may be counterfeit. At the moment, there’s no easy way to reliably test a drug in the field.

That could change if a new technology called PharmaCheck, developed by researchers at Boston University, moves from prototype to reality.

The pill in question is dissolved in liquid. Miniscule amounts of the liquid pass through channels in what’s called a microfluidic chip. The channels include a molecule that will bond to the real drug. That event produces fluorescence that can be measured by a smartphone app—which reveals how much of the drug is present and active in the pill.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The technology was recently awarded one of nine grants by the National Collegiate Inventors and Innovators Alliance. The research team plans to soon test prototypes in the field in Ghana.

If PharmaCheck works, regulators and pharmacists could have a simple, inexpensive method to determine whether a drug is effective. Which could impede counterfeiters and save thousands of lives.

—Cynthia Graber

[The above text is a transcript of this podcast.]

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe