Jilted Rock Sparrows Sing Loudest

A rock sparrow's song broadcasts his luck with the ladies--whether good or bad. Daisy Yuhas reports

Illustration of a Bohr atom model spinning around the words Science Quickly with various science and medicine related icons around the text

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

A male songbird’s tune advertises his status and availability to choosy females. But rock sparrows offer a notable exception: their crooning can also reveal when the male has been jilted. 

Researchers studied the songs of male rock sparrows in the French Alps. These sparrows have a simple song—one element, repeated several times, as you can hear in this young male.

When the researchers compared a male's song to his success in siring chicks, they found subtle surprises. Older sparrows—who have slower-paced, higher pitched songs than younger birds—sire the most chicks. This suggests females use other cues, such as physical appearance, in selecting the best mate.

In an added twist, males whose mates have paired off with another bird sing louder than males with faithful females. This is the first known case of an inverse link between bird song volume and a male’s nesting success. The study is in the journal PLoS ONE. [Erwin Nemeth et al., Rock Sparrow Song Reflects Male Age and Reproductive Success]

The male isn’t just singing his sorrows, however. The researchers propose that the male raises his voice in a desperate attempt to call back his partner—the rock sparrow version of the late-night drink-and-dial.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


—Daisy Yuhas

[The above text is a transcript of this podcast.]

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe