New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Jupiter Moon to Be Searched for Life

If anything's alive on the ice-covered ocean world of Europa, a future NASA mission hopes to find it.

 

DIGITAL VISION

Illustration of a Bohr atom model spinning around the words Science Quickly with various science and medicine related icons around the text

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

“And this mission would be NASA’s first mission that is directly tasked with searching for signs of life on another world since the Viking Spacecraft were given that task back in the 1970s on the surface of Mars.”

Kevin Hand of NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory.

“We talk about finding, searching for signs of life on some of these ocean worlds, and in particular these geologically active ocean worlds with rocky seafloors like Europa.”


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Hand spoke February 17th at the annual meeting of the American Association for the Advancement of Science in Boston. He’s the deputy project scientist for the Europa mission, which plans to send a lander to the ice-covered moon of Jupiter.

“We’re talking about environments where life could be alive today…so these ice shells may serve as a window into the oceans below and oceanic material may be coming up to the surface. Where a mission like a lander could actually sample that material directly…and I’m the pre-project scientist for this mission. This is a mission that would reach the launch pad in the 2024–2025 time frame, it would land on Europa’s surface and operate for about 20-plus days.”

The instrumentation that gets sent to Europa needs to be recognize signs of life in minute amounts.

“A picomole of organics per gram of sample is one key requirement. Being able to detect cell number abundances to as low of a level as 100 cells per milliliter of ice acquired from Europa’s surface. We reached that benchmark by comparison to subglacial Lake Vostok here on Earth. And the size that the microscope in the model payload would need to be able characterize is down to a 0.2 micron diameter for any putative organisms collected in a surface sample of Europa. This mission is a bold, very exciting mission that marks NASA’s return to the direct search for life via in situ capabilities on a potentially inhabited ocean world beyond Earth.”

—Steve Mirsky

[The above text is a transcript of this podcast.]

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe