Keeping Coal Mines from Exploding

Preventing explosions in coal mines isn't rocket science. David Biello reports

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Mining is the second most dangerous profession in the U.S., averaging

27 deaths for every 100,000 workers per year, according to the U.S. Census Bureau. That safety record is now blown. On April 5th, 25 of the roughly 20,000 miners in West Virginia died in a tragic incident at the Upper Big Branch mine. Four remained missing as of Friday.  

The explosion appears to have been caused by a buildup of


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


methane . An odorless, colorless, tasteless gas that you know as natural gas. It explodes at concentrations in the air of as little as 5 percent. The incident also could have been caused or exacerbated by coal dust, which is equally combustible. That's why we burn it to make electricity.  

The problem of

methane or coal dust in a mine's air is relatively easy to solve. Massive fans at many mines make it feel like you are standing in a wind tunnel. Coating the walls with limestone also can dampen the effects of coal dust.  

Still, Massey Energy racked up more than

50 violations of various safety standards at Upper Big Branch in the past month alone. Those include several for failing to follow federal ventilation requirements.  

Cutting back on coal use could also reduce the danger's of mining. And it'd have a side effect: helping

combat a little problem known as global climate change .

—David Biello

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe