New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Keeping Oil Underground in Ecuador

The United Nations partners with Ecuador in a bid to pay for the privilege of keeping oil underground and a tropical forest undisturbed. David Biello reports

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Yasuni National Park in Ecuador is home to one of the richest concentrations of plant and animal species on the planet. More tree species grow in a single hectare of Yasuni than in all of North America and the reserve hosts an indigenous group still living in isolation. 

Now the United Nations Development Programme has set up a fund to pay the government of Ecuador to keep Yasuni unspoiled by leaving as much 850 million barrels of crude oil under the park's ground. 

At $80 per barrel that's nearly $70 billion worth. And roughly 400 million metric tons of CO2 that wouldn't enter the atmosphere. 


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


All Ecuador wants in return is $3.6 billion over the next decade for a pledge never to develop the oil field. Countries that paid into the UNDP fund would receive a credit for the avoided greenhouse gas emissions, potentially offsetting some of their own oil burning. Ecuador plans to use the money to develop renewable energy. 

Germany has committed to pay some $50 million per year over the next 12 years. Other commitments remain sparse on the ground despite the plan having been floated since 2007. 

As it is, oil accounts for more than half of Ecuador's exports as well as one-third of the government's budget. 

But Ecuador's experience with Chevron may have convinced it that oil actually stinks—an epic lawsuit has been fought for nearly two decades over oil spills and toxic waste left behind by previous development. Perhaps Yasuni is a sign of the end of the petroleum age

—David Biello

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe