Kepler Searches for Habitable Planets, Part 2

NASA's Kepler mission's principal investigator, Bill Borucki, talks about the search for exoplanets that might be habitable. Part 2 of 2. John Matson reports

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Bill Borucki is the principal investigator for NASA's planet-finding Kepler spacecraft. At a recent meeting of the American Astronomical Society, Borucki explained how long it will be before Kepler can tell us whether habitable, Earth-like planets are common or rare:

“I really think by three years from now we will have that answer. The mission is designed to do it in that period of time.”

That's for Earth-like planets orbiting sun-like stars. For habitable planets orbiting brighter, hotter stars, the search will take longer. Kepler has reserve fuel if NASA extends the mission.

“Each year we give you more information. We find more Earths, we find more in the habitable zone. Because if you found one in the habitable zone, would that mean it had life? It might not. Earth might be very special. But if you find 10 of them, or a hundred, or a thousand, almost certainly some of them have life. There are so many opportunities for life to develop, it will have taken advantage of some of those. So each year we will be able to give you a more full answer, a more certain answer. Certainly in three years, we will give you the first good answers. And after that they will be even better.”

—John Matson

[The above text is a transcript of this podcast.]

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe