Keurig Coffee Drinkers Hack Back

Users of the K-cup coffee company’s products have counterattacked against its efforts to restrict the brands that their new machines can brew. Larry Greenemeier reports

 

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


You’ve heard about computer hacking. You may even have heard of hacking automobiles. And now hackers have had their way with the most important appliance in the home: the coffeemaker. If it’s a Keurig brand anyway.
 
Keurig brewers use those ubiquitous K-cups to make one cup of coffee at a time. When the company introduced their Keurig 2.0 last August, it added a new piece of tech—a form of Digital Rights Management (DRM) technology. The new devices come with a sensor that only allows brewing if you’re using company-approved coffee. Other—read cheaper—kinds of pods get rejected. Older approved brand K-cups also got snubbed by the new machines, meaning that even Keurig loyalists could not use any pods they had in stock.
 
But hackers—who basically run on coffee themselves—could not resist this challenge to their caffeine supply. Some claim to have fooled the 2.0’s DRM sensor simply by placing a used foil lid from an accepted K-cup on top of an unapproved K-cup. Another 2.0 customer demonstrated how placing a small magnet near the sensor can confuse the system into accepting multiple different brands of K-cups.
 
Keurig apparently missed the memo explaining that consumers like to have choices. That goes double when you it comes to their morning Joe.
 
—Larry Greenemeier
 
[The above text is a transcript of this podcast.]

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe