Kids Say Where Tech Should Go

A survey of children around the world found out what the kids would most like their technology to be able to do next. Larry Greenemeier reports

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

What's the future of technology? Who better to ask than today's kids?

That's exactly what a company called Latitude Research did last year when they asked 201 children 12 and under around the world to draw a picture of something they'd like to see their computers or the Internet do differently.

The results were published in June. The researchers found that kids don't distinguish much between their lives online and offline. Or as the researchers put it, technology isn't something that mediates young people’s experience—it "pervades" it. Most kids want to interact with computers, robots and other technology in a more personal way, using voice, gesture and touch rather than a mouse or keyboard.

Some interesting regional differences emerged. Kids in the U.S., Europe and Australia want better interactivity so they can more easily play games or communicate with their computers. Kids in Africa and South Asia focused on interactivity with more concrete results in mind, like help with homework or even cleaning their rooms. They’ll never know the joy of the Commodore 64 I grew up with. Lucky kids.

—Larry Greenemeier

[The above text is a transcript of this podcast.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


]

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe