Kids' Sweet Tooth Related to Growth

A study published in the journal Physiology & Behavior finds that kids with a sweet tooth may be craving sugar because it's powering ongoing growth and development. Karen Hopkin reports.

Illustration of a Bohr atom model spinning around the words Science Quickly with various science and medicine related icons around the text

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

[The following is an exact transcript of this podcast.]

Generally speaking, kids do like their candy. Now scientists say that this sweet tooth may have some basis in biology. Because sugars may help fuel the rapid growth of childhood.

Stroll down the cereal aisle of your local supermarket, and you’ll no doubt notice that children favor foods that are on the sweet side. But those cravings tend to wane as kids reach adolescence. To find out why, researchers took 143 children, ages 11 to 15, and assessed their preference for sweetness by having them “sip and spit” shots of sugar water. They then separated the kids into two groups, one with a high preference for sweets, and the other with a low preference.

What they found is that the kids who really like their sugar were growing faster than the kids who said that the syrup samples were just too sweet. The sugar fiends had higher blood concentrations of a biomarker associated with bone growth, findings that appear in the March 23rd issue of the journal Physiology & Behavior. And in case you were wondering, the drop-off in sugar-liking did not correlate with the onset of puberty. So it’s really the tapering off of growth that makes kids decide that candy’s no longer dandy.

—Karen Hopkin 


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


60-Second Science is a daily podcast. Subscribe to this Podcast:

RSS | iTunes 

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe