August 8, 2011

Kuiper Belt Gets New Notches

A telescopic sky survey finds 14 previously unknown objects in and around the Kuiper Belt. John Matson reports

SUBSCRIBE TO 60-Second Space

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.

The map of the solar system may be due for a little updating. A telescopic sky survey has turned up 14 new objects in and around the Kuiper Belt, the icy debris field out past Neptune. [Scott Sheppard et al., "A Southern Sky and Galactic Plane Survey for Bright Kuiper Belt Objects"]

The new trans-Neptunian objects, as they're called, are just the latest to revise our view of the outer solar system. The first Kuiper Belt object was spotted in 1992, but it was not until the middle of the last decade that the belt got its biggest notches. That's when astronomers turned up a handful of large trans-Neptunian objects that led to the creation of the "dwarf planet" category.

Some of the newfound objects may be large enough to qualify as dwarf planets. The key is that they need to be several hundred kilometers across, large enough to have settled into a round shape. So far there are just five confirmed dwarf planets, including the most famous Kuiper Belt object, Pluto. The new potential dwarfs will join several other candidates awaiting confirmation and recognition.

Astronomers will need more detailed observations to determine if any of the newfound objects are truly round. If so, they may be able to slip past the velvet rope and into the exclusive dwarf-planet club.

—John Matson

[The above text is a transcript of this podcast.]

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American