Land under Water

Sea level rise looks likely to come faster--and be worse--than even scientists anticipated. David Biello reports

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

[Below is the original script. But a few changes may have been made during the recording of this audio podcast.]

Drilling into the rocks off the coast of Antarctica is revealing a more accurate picture of our future climate. That's because about four million years ago, carbon dioxide levels in the atmosphere were roughly 400 parts-per-million—a level we're likely to reach again in the next few years. Already, CO2 concentrations in the atmosphere are 386 ppm, up from 280 ppm just two centuries ago. 

Of course, back in the Pliocene, there were alligators in Tennessee and our distant ancestors the Australopithicenes graced eastern Africa. Plus, sea levels were about 23 feet higher, more in some areas. 


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Carbon dioxide levels conspired with cyclical changes in the tilt of the Earth's rotational axis to melt much of the West Antarctic Ice Sheet back then, according to a study published in Nature this week. Scientists drilled a more than 4,000 foot long rock core from beneath the Ross Ice Shelf that revealed this ice sheet waxed and waned in response to these climate cycles. 

Computer simulations predict the same melting will occur sometime in the next 1,000 years, possibly as soon as this century. With even the most optimistic governments aiming to prevent concentrations of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere from going above 450 ppm, today's ocean front property is likely to get a lot wetter.

—David Biello

60-Second Earth is a weekly podcast from Scientific American. Subscribe to this Podcast: RSS | iTunes

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe