Lasers ID Insects by Wing Beats
Using laser sensing of insect wing beats, plus location and time of day, researchers report 99 percent accuracy identifying individuals in a group of six insect species. A future surveillance system would be of interest to farmers and insect-borne disease monitors. Cynthia Graber reports
By Cynthia Graber
SUBSCRIBE TO Science Quickly
On supporting science journalism
If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.
To a farmer, good insects pollinate. And bad insects decimate. And they’ve often had a tough time knowing which flying creatures were invading their crops. Now eavesdropping researchers might offer help.
For 60 years, scientists have tried to identify insects by their wing sounds. The challenge increases with distance, wind and other noises. So researchers created a monitor using lasers. When an insect crosses the laser, the shadow of the wing beats gets recorded and translated into an mp3. Here’s a female aedes aegypti mosquito. Here’s a female culex quinque fasciatus.
The researchers spent three years gathering data from dozens of sensors. They have tens of millions of data points—more than had been previously collected all together—for their algorithms. Using wing beats plus location and time of day, they’ve achieved up to 99 percent accuracy identifying six insect species thus far.
The research will be published in the Journal of Insect Behavior. [Yanping Chen, Eamonn Keogh et al, Flying Insect Classification With Inexpensive Sensors]
The prototype was made of LEGOs, a 99-cent laser pointer and part of a TV remote. So researchers say a setup could be manufactured for less than $10. It could identify both farm pests and disease carriers. Which could help people picnic in peace.
—Cynthia Graber
[The above text is a transcript of this podcast.]
Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism
Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.
When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.
Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber
