"Man in the Moon" Facing Factors Figured

A new study explains why the odds favored the man-in-the-moon side to always face Earth. John Matson reports

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Why is the far side of the moon on, well, the far side of the moon?

The moon is tidally locked. That means that it rotates in sync with its orbit around Earth, so that the same side of the moon always faces us. It used to rotate faster, but Earth’s pull slowed it down and locked it in place.

The lunar far side is much more elevated than the near side, which has a group of facelike splotches that some call the man in the moon. All that mass on the far side is pretty attractive, gravitationally speaking. So it would seem to make more sense if the far side of the moon had been the one pulled in our direction.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


A new study in the journal Icarus offers an explanation for the moon’s seemingly unbalanced configuration. [Oded Aharonson, Peter Goldreich and Re'em Sari, "Why Do We See the Man in the Moon?"] Which way the moon locked into place depended on how asymmetric it was, as well as on the torque the moon felt from Earth’s gravity.

Given those factors, the researchers concluded that the chances were about two to one that the moon would lock into place in its current orientation. Which means that in a universe of infinite wonders, the man in the moon is still an odds-on favorite.

—John Matson

[The above text is a transcript of this podcast.]

 

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe