Mars May Still Be Quaking

Rockfalls visible in orbiter images of Mars indicate that geologic activity occurred just a few million years ago and may be ongoing. John Matson reports

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

What's shaking on Mars? A new study suggests that tremors may have rattled the Red Planet just millions of years ago. These earthquakes, well, Marsquakes, could even be ongoing today. That would mean that Mars is not geologically dead, as is usually assumed.

A team of European scientists analyzed imagery of a Martian fault system from a NASA orbiter. In the high-resolution photos, the researchers could identify individual boulders that have tumbled down cliffs near the fault.

They found that the most rockfalls, and the biggest boulders, were concentrated around one part of the fault system. That’s what you would expect near the epicenter of a Marsquake. And it’s not what you would expect from a more mundane cause—avalanches caused by melting ice, for instance. The study appears in the Journal of Geophysical Research. [Gerald P. Roberts et al., "Possible evidence of paleomarsquakes from fallen boulder populations, Cerberus Fossae, Mars"]


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Because the fault system cuts through terrain that is just millions of years old, the Marsquakes themselves would also have been very recent. Some rockfalls appear so young that winds have not yet erased the tracks left by boulders rolling downhill.

Whether the Red Planet remains geologically active is uncertain. But rolling rocks support the idea that Mars is still rocking and rolling.

—John Matson

[The above text is a transcript of this podcast.]

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe