Mars Rover Prepares for 7 Minutes of Terror

The Curiosity rover is set to begin exploring Mars on August 6. But first it has to land. John Matson reports

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Big rover, big-deal landing.

Mars should soon have a new resident. On August 6th, NASA’s latest rover, Curiosity, is scheduled to arrive. Curiosity is the size of a compact car, and it’s fully loaded—with an unprecedented collection of science instruments.

But before those instruments get put to work comes Curiosity’s descent and landing process sequence—what’s being called the “seven minutes of terror.” It includes parachutes, landing rockets and a hovering sky crane to lower the rover to the surface.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


At a July 16th news conference, NASA’s Doug McCuistion tackled the obvious question: “Is it crazy? Well, Not so much. Once you understand it, it’s not a crazy concept. It works. Is it risky? Landing on Mars is always risky. There are hundreds of discrete events that occur, from release of the cruise stage to parachute deployments to heat shield deployments. All of these are unique, and any one could cause problems. We go from 13,000 miles an hour to zero in seven minutes. That’s quite a challenge in itself. And then there’s the unknown, there’s Mars. Mars throws things at you: dust storms, atmospheric density changes, wind. So it’s a very unique and a very challenging environement.”

If all those challenges are met, the rover should help settle the question of whether Mars once had conditions favorable for life. Thus satisfying Curiosity.

—John Matson

[The above text is a transcript of this podcast.]

 

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe