Martian Water Stuck in Minerals

Significant amounts of water exist on Mars, sequestered within hydrated minerals and stored in the planet's crust. John Matson reports

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Mars today is pretty dry. But billions of years ago, water flowed across the Red Planet. It ran in rivers that carved deep valleys. And it may have even filled a Martian ocean inside what today look like the remains of ancient shorelines.

So where’d all the water go? Some of it is locked up in polar ice caps. But much more may be buried in the ground.

"It’s a good amount of water."


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


That's Jack Mustard, professor of geological sciences at Brown University, on March 20th at the Lunar and Planetary Science Conference in The Woodlands, Texas.

So the work we presented was to estimate the amount of water that could be sequestered or captured within the hydrated minerals, and stored within the crust of Mars." [J. F. Mustard et al., "Sequestration of Volatiles in the Martian Crust through Hydrated Minerals: A Significant Planetary Reservoir of Water"]

These hydrated minerals, he says, are all over. And they run pretty deep.“We used a variety of indicators to estimate the depth. One of them is the vast cracks we have in the surface of Mars, such as in Valles Marineris, which can go down to eight kilometers. And we can detect phyllosilicates to that depth, so that tells us at least eight kilometers deep. But we also survey impact craters, which are like drill holes into the surface of Mars. And the bigger the crater, the deeper the drill hole.

“So we’ve identified hydrated minerals in craters as large as 100 kilometers, which gives us a rough estimate of around 10 kilometers depth that we’ve excavated from there. So for those two independent pieces of evidence we estimate at least the top 10 kilometers of the crust have strong signatures of hydrated minerals in them.”

If all the water were liberated from those minerals and spread across the entire planet, it would make a pretty impressive reservoir.

"If we take all the water that we know to exist in the polar caps on Mars, it's around 30 meters of water. So this is probably around three to five times the amount of water that we see currently in the polar caps on Mars."

That amount might not impress deep-diving James Cameron, but it's a significant reservoir by Mars standards. Freed up, it would flood the entire Martian surface under at least 100 meters of water. "It's enough to go swimming in."

—John Matson

[The above text is a transcript of this podcast.]

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe