New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Massive Survey Creates Amazon Tree Census

A tree survey in the Amazon by more than 150 researchers led to an estimate that up to 57 percent of Amazon trees could qualify for threatened species status by 2050

 

BRAND X (MARS)

Illustration of a Bohr atom model spinning around the words Science Quickly with various science and medicine related icons around the text

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Some 12 percent of the forests of the Amazon have been lost in recorded history. Another 9 to 28 percent will be gone by 2050. But we have not known which species of trees are taking the biggest hits. In part because it’s so difficult to do the fieldwork involved in species surveys.

Now, in a massive effort, a team of more than 158 researchers studied 1,200 plots of trees in the Amazon. They estimated the effects of deforestation on 5,000 species and modeled the impact of deforestation on some 10,000 more.

“With the business as usual scenario, roughly half of the Amazon will be deforested in 2050, leading to similar losses in mean species abundances.” Hans ter Steege of Utrecht University in the Netherlands, one of the study participants.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The findings mean that 36 to 57 percent of Amazon trees could qualify for the International Union for the Conservation of Nature’s red list of threatened species, including the commercially valuable Brazil Nut and Cacao.

Nigel Pittman of Chicago’s Field Museum also worked on the study. “If we were to put on the red list all of these Amazonian trees that aren’t currently listed but probably deserve to be, that would increase the total number of threatened species on Earth by about a quarter, about 22 percent.” The research is in the journal Science Advances. [Hans ter Steege et al, Estimating the global conservation status of over 15,000 Amazonian tree species]

But there is some good news. Government actions could slow the rate of deforestation. Also, deforestation has decreased in recent years. And half of Amazonian forests already lie in protected areas.

ter Steege: “Thus, if we can protect these areas from threats they face, such as fires, degradation, deforestation, large-scale damage, and mining, the Amazon could be a showcase of large-scale conservation worldwide.”

—Cynthia Graber

[The above text is a transcript of this podcast.]

Cynthia Graber is a print and radio journalist who covers science, technology, agriculture, and any other stories in the U.S. or abroad that catch her fancy. She's won a number of national awards for her radio documentaries, including the AAAS Kavli Science Journalism Award, and is the co-host of the food science podcast Gastropod. She was a Knight Science Journalism fellow at MIT.

More by Cynthia Graber

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe